Make an Enquiry
Knowledge Base

Commercial solar economics

Mitigating Export Curtailment Risks in Commercial Solar Projects

25 October 20263 min read
Aerial view of a large-scale commercial solar PV installation on an industrial warehouse roof.

Understand how DNO export constraints impact your solar ROI and learn how to navigate G100 compliance and battery integration to protect your project's viability.

The Challenge of Grid Constraints

For many commercial organisations, the ambition to deploy large-scale solar PV is increasingly met with a technical hurdle: the Distribution Network Operator (DNO) export limit. When a site’s generation capacity exceeds the local grid's ability to accept power, the DNO may impose a cap on the amount of electricity that can be exported to the network [8]. For finance and operations directors, this creates a clear risk—if your system is forced to curtail generation during peak production hours, the projected return on investment (ROI) can be significantly eroded.

It is critical to distinguish between generation capacity and export capacity [4]. You may be permitted to install a large solar array to meet your internal demand, but the DNO may restrict the amount of surplus energy that can flow back into the grid [4]. Understanding this distinction early in the project lifecycle is essential for maintaining financial modelling accuracy.

Navigating G99 and G100 Compliance

In the UK, connecting generation assets requires adherence to strict technical standards. Installations above 16A per phase typically fall under the G99 application process [9, 10]. If your site faces export constraints, you will likely need to implement an Export Limitation Scheme (ELS) that complies with EREC G100 standards [4, 6].

An ELS acts as a gatekeeper, monitoring the net flow at your supply intake [6]. If the system detects that export is approaching the DNO-mandated limit, the controller will automatically throttle the inverter output or divert energy to prevent a breach [4, 6]. While this ensures compliance and avoids costly grid reinforcement charges, it effectively turns off potential revenue or savings if not managed correctly.

Strategic Mitigation: The Role of Battery Storage

Rather than accepting curtailment as an unavoidable loss, many businesses are choosing to co-locate Battery Energy Storage with their Commercial Solar PV systems [2, 8].

By integrating a battery, you can capture the excess energy that would otherwise be curtailed by the G100 controller [8]. This stored energy can then be discharged during periods of high site demand or peak tariff pricing, effectively shifting your generation profile to match your consumption [2]. This strategy transforms a potential 'lost' unit of electricity into a valuable asset that reduces your reliance on grid-imported power.

Comparison of Mitigation Strategies

StrategyMechanismPrimary Benefit
Export Limitation (G100)Throttles inverter outputEnsures DNO compliance; avoids grid upgrade costs
Battery Co-locationStores excess energy for later useMaximises self-consumption; mitigates curtailment losses
Grid ReinforcementUpgrades local network capacityRemoves export caps; requires DNO approval and capital
Conceptual diagram showing solar power flowing into a building, with excess being captured by a battery instead of being restricted by a grid gate.
Battery Storage as a Buffer - Conceptual illustration showing how a battery system intercepts energy that would otherwise be curtailed by a G100 controller, allowing for deferred consumption. Numbers are illustrative for conceptual clarity.Source: Conceptual model for energy flow management.Illustrative

Commercial Implications for Decision-Makers

For Finance Directors, the primary concern is the 'cost of inaction' versus the 'cost of mitigation.' Delaying a project to wait for grid upgrades can result in missed savings and exposure to volatile energy markets. Conversely, installing a system that is heavily curtailed without a storage strategy may fail to meet internal hurdle rates.

Operations and Estates Managers should prioritise early-stage grid feasibility studies. Understanding your site's specific export limit before finalising the system design allows for a more robust Funding overview strategy. Whether you choose Fully Funded Solar (PPA) or Outright Purchase, the technical design must account for the reality of your local grid connection.

The SolarTech Perspective

At SolarTech, we believe that grid constraints should not be a barrier to decarbonisation. Our approach focuses on transparent, data-led design. We work with our clients to model the impact of export limits on their specific load profiles, ensuring that the proposed system size and storage capacity are optimised for the site's unique constraints. We do not promise outcomes that the grid cannot support; instead, we provide the technical rigour required to make informed investment decisions.

For ongoing performance, our Operations & Maintenance teams ensure that your G100 controllers and inverters remain calibrated and compliant, protecting your asset's long-term operational value.

Mitigation Strategy Comparison - This comparison highlights the operational trade-offs between standard export limitation and energy storage, illustrating why battery co-location is the preferred strategy for maximizing asset value.Source: Comparison based on industry standard practices for commercial solar deployment in the UK.Illustrative